LifeGraph+ · by LifeByLogic

Discover your next “aha!” moment.

Save results from all 33 of our tests free. Retake later and see what changed. With Plus, read up to four results from our 11 core assessments together, with the evidence shown.

Create account Member login

Free account, no card. Plus: 7-day free trial on your first subscription.

Continue with Google, email and password, or a magic link sent to your inbox.

Illustration One saved result from four of our five labs, every pair joined, as a reading draws them.

Brain Lab
Crossroads Lab
Behavior Lab
Life Dashboard

Colour shows the lab a test belongs to. A ribbon's width never stands for a score or a strength.

Worked examples · Plus readings

Two to four results, read together.

Six worked examples, each a question asked of two to four saved results, in the format Plus readings have today. Every name and value is invented.

Worked example · Rowan · 4 results

“Why am I tired even though I like what I do?”

1Meaning in Life
2Stress & Burnout
3Chronotype
4Flourishing Index

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connections this reading found: 1–2, 1–4, 2–3, 2–4. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

Your results point less to overload (Stress is Moderate) than to a cost you are not recovering from (Burnout is Elevated). Three results suggest different drains; two weeks of tagged check-ins can separate them.

Support: US 988 · UK 116 123 · Canada 9-8-8 · findahelpline.com. Every reading that includes Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing shows these lines.

Each result on its own scale

1Meaning in Life
Meaning Index 6.3 Moderate meaning0–10
2Stress & Burnout
Stress 48 Moderate0–100
Burnout 63 Elevated0–100
3Chronotype
Chronotype 28 Evening-Leaning
4Flourishing Index
Overall 6.4 Holding pattern0–10

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they agree

Contribution leads in both Meaning and Flourishing: consistent, though both are your own answers about related ideas.

Where they pull apart

Direction is strong (Purpose) while say over your time is weak (Autonomy & Freedom): you know where you are going, with little room to choose the route.

Competing explanations

Timing: low-energy days follow early starts. Early start
Recovery: they follow evenings you did not protect. Protected evening
Unseen effort: they follow days your work got no response. Got a response

What would show this wrong

If after two weeks no tag lines up with your energy, the tiredness probably has a source these questionnaires do not measure, such as sleep or health.

1Meaning in LifeSaved Aug 14, 2026

Direction is clear; proof that it lands is not

Meaning Index 6.3, Seeker profile. Purpose 7.8 is your highest presence facet; Mattering 4.5 your lowest.

Read with your Burnout result, this gap may matter: Growth and Contribution, your top sources, both take effort, and unanswered effort may be harder to recover from. With Search high, two readings compete: your work lands unheard, or you are still finding where it should land. If it is feedback, mood should lift on days tagged “Got a response”.

A question to sit with: You know where you are going, yet your sense of mattering trails, and your Burnout result says your tank is running low. If the tiredness comes from giving without hearing back, then whose response are you still waiting for?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

Among people actively searching for meaning, how much meaning they already had was more strongly tied to their life satisfaction.

How it relates: Related idea (Search with presence)

What does not carry over: About life-satisfaction judgements, not energy or mood; two indexes list the co-authors in a different order.

Steger, M. F., Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2011). Is a life without meaning satisfying? The moderating role of the search for meaning in satisfaction with life judgments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(3), 173–180. doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.569171

Your values

Meaning Index 6.3 Moderate meaning · scale 0–10
Coherence 7.3 High · scale 0–10
Purpose 7.8 High · scale 0–10
Mattering 4.5 Mid · scale 0–10
Search 7.5 High · scale 0–10
Connection 5.5 Mid · scale 0–10
Contribution 8.5 High · scale 0–10
Growth 8.8 High · scale 0–10
Transcendence 2.9 Low · scale 0–10
Vitality 5.1 Mid · scale 0–10
Legacy 3.2 Low · scale 0–10

2Stress & BurnoutSaved Sep 20, 2026

Depleted more than pressured, and the fix differs

Burnout 63 (Elevated) sits a band above Stress 48 (Moderate): exhaustion is outrunning pressure.

That split changes what to try first: doing less eases pressure, your lower score. Read with your Meaning result, it points to recovery: Growth and Contribution may be the things you never switch off from, because they matter. The competing reading is load that Stress underrates. If it is recovery, energy should be better after evenings tagged “Protected evening”.

A question to sit with: You are more drained than pressured, and your Meaning result suggests the drain may come from the things that matter most to you. If resting means stepping back from what matters, then what would you have to believe to let yourself stop?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

Studies reviewed here found that employees who mentally switched off from work in free time tended to be more satisfied with life and less strained, without being less engaged at work; highly job-involved people tended to switch off less.

How it relates: Related idea (recovery)

What does not carry over: Employee samples, mostly correlational and diary studies; it does not show that switching off will change your score.

Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 114–118. doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434979

Your values

Stress 48 Moderate · scale 0–100
Burnout 63 Elevated · scale 0–100

3ChronotypeSaved Jul 2, 2026

A later clock meeting early days

Morningness 28, Evening-Leaning: later than the middle of the scale, but not at the evening end.

Against your Burnout result, it offers one concrete reason for exhaustion without overload: the same work may cost more when it lands before your clock is ready. The competing reading is that you already arrange hard work around your clock, so timing costs little. If timing matters, energy on days tagged “Early start” should sit lower than on later starts.

A question to sit with: Your body clock runs later than the middle, and you are drained more than pressured. If your hardest work keeps landing before your clock is ready, then which hour of this week did you spend paying for a schedule you never chose?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In volunteers from teenagers to retirees, later chronotypes tended to show a bigger gap between work-day and free-day sleep timing, called social jetlag, and more sleep debt on work days.

How it relates: Related idea

What does not carry over: Our test does not measure social jetlag; the paper’s findings on smoking and other stimulants are never shown.

Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., & Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: Misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiology International, 23(1–2), 497–509. doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979

Your values

Chronotype 28 Evening-Leaning · scale 0–100

4Flourishing IndexSaved Sep 12, 2026

Giving a lot, with little say over your time

Overall 6.4, Holding pattern. Service & Contribution 8.5 leads; Time Freedom & Rest 2.4 trails.

Beside your Meaning result, this shows where the effort goes. What this test adds is choice: Autonomy & Freedom is also low (2.9), and with Burnout this high, less say may mean fewer ways to recover. More free time may then help less if someone else schedules it. If choice matters, evenings tagged “My choice” should bring better energy.

A question to sit with: You give a lot but have little say over your time, and your Meaning result puts contribution among your strongest sources. If your generosity is what fills your evenings, then what would you stop giving to win one evening back?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In surveys from four countries, people who spent money to buy themselves time reported greater life satisfaction; in a small field experiment, a time-saving purchase was followed by a better mood than a material one.

How it relates: Related idea (Time Freedom & Rest)

What does not carry over: Assumes spare money; a small experiment; we describe it and never prescribe it.

Whillans, A. V., Dunn, E. W., Smeets, P., Bekkers, R., & Norton, M. I. (2017). Buying time promotes happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(32), 8523–8527. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706541114

Your values

Overall 6.4 Holding pattern · scale 0–10
Joy & Life Satisfaction 6.8 Mid · scale 0–10
Mental Health 6.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Inner Life & Self-Awareness 7.2 High · scale 0–10
Personal Growth 6.6 Mid · scale 0–10
Physical Health & Vitality 6.1 Mid · scale 0–10
Meaning & Purpose 7.4 High · scale 0–10
Prospective Self-Continuity & Hope 6.9 Mid · scale 0–10
Close Relationships 6.7 Mid · scale 0–10
Material Security 7.0 High · scale 0–10
Integrity & Values Alignment 7.6 High · scale 0–10
Service & Contribution 8.5 High · scale 0–10
Community & Belonging 6.2 Mid · scale 0–10
Autonomy & Freedom 2.9 Low · scale 0–10
Work & Calling 7.1 High · scale 0–10
Time Freedom & Rest 2.4 Low · scale 0–10
Environmental Fit 6.5 Mid · scale 0–10

A one-week experiment

If it is 8 pm on Tuesday or Thursday, then close helping and learning tasks for the night, even unfinished ones.

Likely obstacle: “Just one more thing.”

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Protected evening
My choice
Early start
Got a response

One more question: How likely are you to close your helping and learning tasks at 8 pm this Tuesday, even unfinished ones: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: These results were saved up to eleven weeks apart, and none measures your sleep, hours or workload. Treat the three drains as possibilities to test, not findings about you.

The 4 studies this reading cites

Steger, M. F., Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2011). Is a life without meaning satisfying? The moderating role of the search for meaning in satisfaction with life judgments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(3), 173–180. doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.569171
Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 114–118. doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434979
Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., & Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: Misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiology International, 23(1–2), 497–509. doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979
Whillans, A. V., Dunn, E. W., Smeets, P., Bekkers, R., & Norton, M. I. (2017). Buying time promotes happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(32), 8523–8527. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706541114

Worked example · Kai · 2 results

“Why do my plans fall apart by Wednesday?”

1TypeAtlas
2Chronotype

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connection this reading found: 1–2. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

A strong pull toward structure meets a later body clock. Early starts can build a sleep debt across the week, so plans may fail from tiredness by Wednesday, not from poor planning.

Each result on its own scale

1TypeAtlas
Energy 46 near the middle
Information 37 toward Intuition
Decisions 58 near the middle
Structure 72 toward Judging
2Chronotype
Chronotype 31 Evening-Leaning

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

A wish to settle the plan and a clock that starts late pull in different directions.

Competing explanations

Sleep debt: sleep hours shrink and energy falls from Monday to Wednesday.
Start time: plans that begin later hold better. Late start
Fullness: lighter days hold better, whatever the hour. Light plan

What would show this wrong

If plans fail just as often on late-start and light-plan days, the cause is probably something these two tests do not measure, such as what interrupts your week.

1TypeAtlasSaved Sep 3, 2026

Structure is your strength; its start time may not be

Your structure axis is 72, toward Judging; your energy axis, 46, sits near the middle.

Read with your Chronotype result, the plan itself may be fine. A preference for closure may front-load the week, and your later clock means its first hours may be your slowest. A plan that slips on Monday morning can feel like a plan that failed. If start time is the issue, energy should hold better on days tagged “Late start”.

A question to sit with: You like plans settled early, and your body clock starts late. If the plan is sound and only its start time is wrong, then what have you been calling a failure of discipline that was really a failure of timing?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In adults who completed both questionnaires, the four type scales lined up with four of the Big Five traits, and scores were continuous, with no support for distinct types.

How it relates: Same idea, other questionnaire

What does not carry over: Myers-Briggs items, not ours; TypeAtlas is not a validated type test.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x

Your values

Energy 46 near the middle · scale 0–100
Information 37 toward Intuition · scale 0–100
Decisions 58 near the middle · scale 0–100
Structure 72 toward Judging · scale 0–100

2ChronotypeSaved Aug 21, 2026

Your clock may run later than your plans

Morningness 31, Evening-Leaning: later than the middle of the scale, well short of the evening end.

Against your pull toward structure, this suggests how plans break. In Wittmann et al. (2006), later types carried more sleep debt on work days, so by Wednesday the same plan may cost more. The competing reading: the plan is too full at any hour. If it is debt, sleep hours should shrink across the week, even with a “Light plan”.

A question to sit with: Your clock leans toward evening, and your TypeAtlas result shows a strong pull toward structure. If each early start borrows a little sleep from the next day, then on which morning this week did Wednesday’s slide really begin?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In volunteers from teenagers to retirees, later chronotypes tended to show a bigger gap between work-day and free-day sleep timing, called social jetlag, and more sleep debt on work days.

How it relates: Related idea

What does not carry over: Our test does not measure social jetlag; the paper’s findings on smoking and other stimulants are never shown.

Your values

Chronotype 31 Evening-Leaning · scale 0–100

A one-week experiment

If it is the evening before a workday, then set tomorrow’s first planned task for 10 am or later.

Likely obstacle: An early meeting someone else sets.

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Late start
Light plan

One more question: How likely are you to set Thursday’s first task for 10 am or later the evening before: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: Neither test measures your sleep or workload; the sleep-debt idea comes from a study of other people, so treat it as a possibility to test.

A review of research on the Myers-Briggs found too little evidence to back its theory or its claimed usefulness.

Students rated an identical, generic personality sketch, which they believed came from a test they had taken, as a highly accurate description of themselves.

The 2 studies this reading cites

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., & Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: Misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiology International, 23(1–2), 497–509. doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979
Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 467–488. doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004467
Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123. doi.org/10.1037/h0059240

Worked example · Noor · 3 results

“Why do I feel alone even with good people around me?”

1Attachment Style
2Flourishing Index
3TypeAtlas

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connections this reading found: 1–2, 1–3, 2–3. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

Your results suggest the people may be there but hard to lean on. Your answers lean toward keeping distance in closeness, and your week leaves little time alone to recharge.

Support: US 988 · UK 116 123 · Canada 9-8-8 · findahelpline.com. Every reading that includes Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing shows these lines.

Each result on its own scale

1Attachment Style
Anxiety 2.6 Below the test’s 4.0 line1–7
Avoidance 5.1 At or above the test’s 4.0 line1–7
2Flourishing Index
Overall 6.1 Holding pattern0–10
3TypeAtlas
Energy 27 toward Introversion
Information 55 near the middle
Decisions 34 toward Feeling
Structure 49 near the middle

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they agree

Avoidance and Close Relationships come from different tests and point the same way: consistent, though both are your own answers.

Where they pull apart

Preferring quiet and keeping distance pull apart: introversion is about where you recharge, avoidance about leaning on others.

Competing explanations

Leaning is hard: mood lifts when you ask for something. Asked for something
No time to recharge: mood lifts the day after time alone. Time alone
The company does not fit: mood lifts only with certain people. Felt understood

What would show this wrong

If mood moves with none of these tags over two weeks, the loneliness may come from something these tests do not ask about, such as distance or a recent change.

1Attachment StyleSaved Sep 9, 2026

Support may be there, but leaning on it is hard

Avoidance 5.1 is above the line the test uses for a style; Anxiety 2.6 is well below it.

Read with your Flourishing result, where Close Relationships is low, two readings compete. The people may be there and hard to lean on: avoidance is discomfort with depending on others, not a lack of them. Or the closeness on offer may not fit what you need. If it is leaning, mood should lift on days tagged “Asked for something”.

A question to sit with: You keep some distance in closeness without much fear of losing people, and your Flourishing result shows close relationships running low. If the people are there but leaning on them feels risky, then who would be most surprised to learn you feel alone?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

An analysis of many adult-attachment questionnaires found two shared underlying dimensions: anxiety about rejection and avoidance of closeness.

How it relates: Definition: the two scores our test gives

What does not carry over: A “style” is a combination of two continuous scores, not a box.

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.

Your values

Anxiety 2.6 Below the test’s 4.0 line · scale 1–7
Avoidance 5.1 At or above the test’s 4.0 line · scale 1–7

2Flourishing IndexSaved Sep 30, 2026

Close support is low, and so is time to yourself

Overall 6.1. Personal Growth 7.9 is your highest area; Time Freedom & Rest 3.2 your lowest.

Close Relationships (3.6) is low too, and your TypeAtlas result leans clearly toward introversion. Together they suggest a second possibility: you may need time alone to come back to people, and your week offers little. Then even good company could drain more than it gives. If so, days tagged “Time alone” should bring a better mood the next day.

A question to sit with: Your week leaves little time that is truly yours, and your TypeAtlas result says you lean toward recharging alone. If company drains you only because you come to it empty, then which would you protect first this week: time alone, or time with them?

Evidence and limits

Your values

Overall 6.1 Holding pattern · scale 0–10
Joy & Life Satisfaction 6.5 Mid · scale 0–10
Mental Health 6.2 Mid · scale 0–10
Inner Life & Self-Awareness 6.9 Mid · scale 0–10
Personal Growth 7.9 High · scale 0–10
Physical Health & Vitality 6.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Meaning & Purpose 6.8 Mid · scale 0–10
Prospective Self-Continuity & Hope 6.6 Mid · scale 0–10
Close Relationships 3.6 Low · scale 0–10
Material Security 6.3 Mid · scale 0–10
Integrity & Values Alignment 7.1 High · scale 0–10
Service & Contribution 6.4 Mid · scale 0–10
Community & Belonging 4.4 Mid · scale 0–10
Autonomy & Freedom 5.8 Mid · scale 0–10
Work & Calling 6.1 Mid · scale 0–10
Time Freedom & Rest 3.2 Low · scale 0–10
Environmental Fit 6.7 Mid · scale 0–10

3TypeAtlasSaved Aug 30, 2026

Preferring quiet is not the same as keeping distance

Your energy axis is 27, toward Introversion; your structure axis, 49, sits near the middle.

Read beside your Attachment result, it separates two things that are easy to blur. Introversion is about where you recharge; avoidance is about leaning on others. You can enjoy good people and still find depending on them hard. If it is only quiet you need, mood should lift after “Time alone” even on days you asked nobody for anything.

A question to sit with: You lean toward recharging alone, and your Attachment result says leaning on people is the hard part. If needing quiet and needing people are both true of you, then what would closeness look like if it did not cost you your solitude?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In adults who completed both questionnaires, the four type scales lined up with four of the Big Five traits, and scores were continuous, with no support for distinct types.

How it relates: Same idea, other questionnaire

What does not carry over: Myers-Briggs items, not ours; TypeAtlas is not a validated type test.

Your values

Energy 27 toward Introversion · scale 0–100
Information 55 near the middle · scale 0–100
Decisions 34 toward Feeling · scale 0–100
Structure 49 near the middle · scale 0–100

A one-week experiment

If someone asks how you are on Tuesday or Thursday, then name one small thing they could actually help with.

Likely obstacle: It feels easier to say “fine”.

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Asked for something
Time alone
Felt understood

One more question: How likely are you to name one small thing someone could help with when they ask on Tuesday: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: Attachment answers can reflect one relationship or one period rather than all of them, and none of these tests counts how often you see people.

A review of research on the Myers-Briggs found too little evidence to back its theory or its claimed usefulness.

Students rated an identical, generic personality sketch, which they believed came from a test they had taken, as a highly accurate description of themselves.

The 2 studies this reading cites

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 467–488. doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004467
Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123. doi.org/10.1037/h0059240

Worked example · Avery · 2 results

“What kind of work would feel like mine again?”

1Career Choice Signature
2Flourishing Index

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connection this reading found: 1–2. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

Your results point to idea work, and to a week with little slack for it. What may feel unlike you is not the work you want but the room it needs.

Support: US 988 · UK 116 123 · Canada 9-8-8 · findahelpline.com. Every reading that includes Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing shows these lines.

Each result on its own scale

1Career Choice Signature
Originating 8.6 toward the higher end0–10
Refining 3.2 toward the lower end0–10
2Flourishing Index
Overall 5.6 Holding pattern0–10

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

What you want to do (new ideas) and the room you have for it (time to yourself) pull apart.

Competing explanations

Missing slack: mood lifts on days with time for an idea. Idea time
A drifted role: mood stays flat even with that time. Idea time

What would show this wrong

If mood is the same on days with and without “Idea time”, slack is probably not the answer.

1Career Choice SignatureSaved Sep 1, 2026

Your strongest pull is toward ideas, not finishing

Originating 8.6 is your highest mode; Refining 3.2, bringing work to a finished state, is your lowest.

With your Flourishing result, the kind of work may not be the problem. Idea work may need slack: time to wander. Time Freedom & Rest is your lowest area, so the mode you like most may be the first squeezed out. Or your role mostly asks for finishing. If slack is missing, mood should lift on days tagged “Idea time”.

A question to sit with: Starting ideas is your strongest mode and finishing them your weakest, and your Flourishing result shows almost no time left over. If the work that feels like yours needs slack your week never gives, then is it the job you have outgrown, or the pace?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

A meta-analysis of workplace studies found that employees who felt they fit their job and organisation tended to be more satisfied and committed and less likely to plan to leave.

How it relates: Related idea (fit)

What does not carry over: We do not measure fit; our modes are our own.

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

Your values

Architecting 5.5 near the middle · scale 0–10
Untangling 6.2 near the middle · scale 0–10
Originating 8.6 toward the higher end · scale 0–10
Synthesizing 7.0 toward the higher end · scale 0–10
Directing 4.8 near the middle · scale 0–10
Connecting 4.5 near the middle · scale 0–10
Refining 3.2 toward the lower end · scale 0–10
Scouting 8.1 toward the higher end · scale 0–10
Tending 4.0 near the middle · scale 0–10

2Flourishing IndexSaved Oct 5, 2026

Growth is high; time and work fit are low

Overall 5.6. Personal Growth 7.6 is your highest area; Time Freedom & Rest 2.8 your lowest.

Beside your Career result, Work & Calling (3.4) also sits low while growth stays high: you may still be developing, just not through work. That fits a squeezed mode better than a wrong career. The competing reading: the role has drifted from you. If so, mood should stay flat even on days tagged “Idea time”.

A question to sit with: You may still be growing, just not through your work, and your Career result says your strongest mode is starting new ideas. If growth has quietly moved outside your job, then what is your job still giving you that you would miss?

Evidence and limits

Your values

Overall 5.6 Holding pattern · scale 0–10
Joy & Life Satisfaction 5.9 Mid · scale 0–10
Mental Health 5.4 Mid · scale 0–10
Inner Life & Self-Awareness 6.6 Mid · scale 0–10
Personal Growth 7.6 High · scale 0–10
Physical Health & Vitality 5.5 Mid · scale 0–10
Meaning & Purpose 5.8 Mid · scale 0–10
Prospective Self-Continuity & Hope 6.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Close Relationships 6.2 Mid · scale 0–10
Material Security 5.7 Mid · scale 0–10
Integrity & Values Alignment 6.4 Mid · scale 0–10
Service & Contribution 6.1 Mid · scale 0–10
Community & Belonging 5.2 Mid · scale 0–10
Autonomy & Freedom 4.6 Mid · scale 0–10
Work & Calling 3.4 Low · scale 0–10
Time Freedom & Rest 2.8 Low · scale 0–10
Environmental Fit 5.9 Mid · scale 0–10

A one-week experiment

If it is Tuesday or Thursday afternoon, then spend 15 minutes on one idea of your own, with nothing to deliver.

Likely obstacle: An unfinished task feels more urgent.

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Idea time

One more question: How likely are you to give one idea of your own 15 minutes on Tuesday afternoon, with nothing to deliver: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: This reading leaves your Stress & Burnout result out, so it cannot weigh how tired you are, and neither test measures your hours.

The study this reading cites

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

Worked example · Sam · 4 results

“Why do small setbacks wipe out my whole evening?”

1Adult ADHD
2Stress & Burnout
3Cognitive Reserve
4Meaning in Life

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connections this reading found: 1–2, 3–4. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

Your results suggest two different reasons. Recovery after a strong reaction may take a while, and your evenings may hold little that absorbs you, so a setback has room to fill them.

Support: US 988 · UK 116 123 · Canada 9-8-8 · findahelpline.com. Every reading that includes Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing shows these lines.

Each result on its own scale

1Adult ADHD
Attention 58 Moderate-high0–100
Hyperactivity 36 Low0–100
Emotional regulation 71 Moderate-high0–100
2Stress & Burnout
Stress 52 Moderate0–100
Burnout 44 Moderate0–100
3Cognitive Reserve
Overall 58 Established0–100
4Meaning in Life
Meaning Index 6.0 Moderate meaning0–10

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

Your sense of meaning looks settled while your evenings do not: the problem looks like recovery, not direction.

Competing explanations

Recovery after reactions: mood stays low the evening after a setback. Setback
Empty evenings: absorbing evenings recover faster. Learned something
Setbacks that touch growth: they hit harder than others. Felt behind

What would show this wrong

If mood after setback days looks like mood after other days, setbacks are not what takes your evenings, and the question needs a different angle.

1Adult ADHDSaved Jun 18, 2026

Settling after a reaction may be the hard part

Emotional regulation 71 is your highest domain, in its Moderate-high band; Hyperactivity 36 is your lowest.

Read with your Stress & Burnout result, some of the pressure you report may be recovery time: the hours after a reaction, not the setback itself. The competing reading is that steady pressure leaves less room to absorb anything. If recovery is the issue, evenings after days tagged “Setback” should score lower on mood, while busy days without one should not.

A question to sit with: Strong feelings may take you a while to settle, and your Stress & Burnout result shows pressure without deep depletion. If the setback lasts minutes but the reaction lasts all evening, then on your last hard evening, where did the setback end and the recovering begin?

Evidence and limits

Always shown with this test

An international consensus statement says ADHD can be diagnosed only by a licensed clinician who interviews the person or their family, not by rating scales alone. Your score describes the experiences you reported; it is not a diagnosis.

Faraone, S. V., Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., et al. (2021). The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 evidence-based conclusions about the disorder. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 128, 789–818. doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.022

Your values

Attention 58 Moderate-high · scale 0–100
Hyperactivity 36 Low · scale 0–100
Emotional regulation 71 Moderate-high · scale 0–100

2Stress & BurnoutSaved Sep 25, 2026

Steady pressure, without the deeper exhaustion

Stress 52 and Burnout 44 both sit in the Moderate band: pressure is present, depletion less so.

Read with your emotional regulation result, this split matters. Burnout sitting below Stress suggests the cost may be short-lived: a hard evening, then recovery, rather than a drain that builds. The competing reading: the drain is building and this is an early snapshot. If it is short-lived, mornings after a “Setback” evening should bring your usual energy.

A question to sit with: Pressure shows up in your results more than depletion, and your attention result points to reactions that linger. If the evening is lost to the echo rather than the event, then what are you telling yourself about the setback that keeps it going?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

How it relates: Related idea (recovery)

What does not carry over: Employee samples, mostly correlational and diary studies; it does not show that switching off will change your score.

Your values

Stress 52 Moderate · scale 0–100
Burnout 44 Moderate · scale 0–100

3Cognitive ReserveSaved May 2, 2026

Your evenings may hold little that absorbs you

Cognitive Reserve 58, Established. Education 74 is your largest part; Leisure 22 your smallest.

With Growth your top Meaning source, this gap stands out: learning matters to you, but your free time holds little of it. An evening with nothing absorbing may leave room for a setback to replay. The competing reading is that you are too tired for leisure. If absorption helps, mood should recover faster on setback evenings tagged “Learned something”.

A question to sit with: Learning built much of your mental reserve, yet your free time holds little of it, and your Meaning result says growth matters most to you. If your evenings stopped feeding the thing you value most, then what did they start feeding instead?

Evidence and limits

Always shown with this test

A research consensus defines cognitive reserve as the adaptability of thinking processes that helps explain why thinking holds up better in some people than others as the brain ages, separate from brain reserve and brain maintenance.

Stern, Y., Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Bartrés-Faz, D., et al. (2020, online 2018). Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 16(9), 1305–1311. doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219

Your values

Overall 58 Established · scale 0–100
Education 74 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Occupation 66 near the middle · scale 0–100
Leisure 22 toward the lower end · scale 0–100
Social 48 near the middle · scale 0–100
Multilingual 30 toward the lower end · scale 0–100
Physical 40 near the middle · scale 0–100

4Meaning in LifeSaved Sep 10, 2026

Growth carries your meaning, so setbacks may land there

Meaning Index 6.0, Holding profile. Growth 8.0 is your strongest source; Transcendence 2.8 your weakest.

Your presence facets sit close together, so meaning looks steady, and much of it rests on growth. With little learning in your leisure, a setback may feel like a step backward in what gives your days meaning. The competing reading: it is the reaction, not the meaning. If it is meaning, mood should dip more on days tagged “Felt behind”.

A question to sit with: Your meaning is steady and rests heavily on growth, and your Cognitive Reserve result shows little learning in your leisure. If a setback feels like falling behind, then is it costing you an evening, or a piece of who you think you should be?

Evidence and limits

Your values

Meaning Index 6.0 Moderate meaning · scale 0–10
Coherence 6.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Purpose 6.5 Mid · scale 0–10
Mattering 6.3 Mid · scale 0–10
Search 5.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Connection 6.8 Mid · scale 0–10
Contribution 6.0 Mid · scale 0–10
Growth 8.0 High · scale 0–10
Transcendence 2.8 Low · scale 0–10
Vitality 5.3 Mid · scale 0–10
Legacy 3.3 Low · scale 0–10

A one-week experiment

If a setback happens after 3 pm on Tuesday or Thursday, then start one absorbing thing for 20 minutes before deciding what the evening is for.

Likely obstacle: Replaying the setback first.

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Setback
Learned something
Felt behind

One more question: How likely are you to start something absorbing for 20 minutes after a setback on Tuesday, before deciding what the evening is for: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: Two of your results are from May 2 and Jun 18, and nothing here measures your evenings directly; the tags will.

The study this reading cites

Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 114–118. doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434979

Worked example · Jordan · 4 results

“What has changed since spring?”

1Stress & Burnout
2Chronotype
3Brain Age Index
4Adult Autism Self-Inventory

Ribbons join every pair you chose. The connections this reading found: 1–2, 2–3. Width is not a score; colour tells labs apart.

The short answer

Your situation looks different from spring and your clock does not: Stress and Burnout both sit a band lower than in March, while your later clock stayed put. Sleep is where they may still meet.

Support: US 988 · UK 116 123 · Canada 9-8-8 · findahelpline.com. Every reading that includes Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing shows these lines.

Each result on its own scale

1Stress & Burnout
Stress 41 Moderate0–100
Burnout 46 Moderate0–100
2Chronotype
Chronotype 26 Evening-Leaning
3Brain Age Index
Overall 71 toward the higher end0–100
4Adult Autism Self-Inventory
Total 38 Some patterns resonated0–80

The marker is your value and the lighter band its range. Shading never means good or bad.

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

Two retakes, two answers: Stress & Burnout looks different from March, while your clock does not.

Competing explanations

The situation changed: energy holds even on heavy days. Heavy day
Spring was the unusual season: heavy days pull energy back down. Heavy day
Timing still costs sleep: fewer sleep hours before early starts. Early start

What would show this wrong

If sleep hours are no shorter before early starts than before late ones, the sleep link in this reading is wrong.

1Stress & BurnoutSaved Sep 29, 2026

A different season, not a different you

Stress 41 and Burnout 46, both Moderate; in March they were 66 and 70, both Elevated.

Your Chronotype, retaken in September, is about where it was, so the change is unlikely to be in your rhythm. Something in your situation shifted, and naming it matters more than the scores. A competing reading: spring was the unusual season, not this one. If the change holds, energy should stay steady even on days tagged “Heavy day”.

A question to sit with: Your stress and burnout both sit a band lower than in March, while your Chronotype result says your body clock has not moved. If your rhythm stayed put and your strain did not, then what changed in your life that you have not yet named?

Evidence and limits

Your values

Stress 41 Moderate · scale 0–100Earlier, Mar 30: 66, Elevated
Burnout 46 Moderate · scale 0–100Earlier, Mar 30: 70, Elevated

2ChronotypeSaved Sep 15, 2026

Your clock stayed put while everything else moved

Morningness 26, Evening-Leaning, close to your March score of 24, in the same band.

Read with your Brain Age result, where Sleep is your lowest part, this steadiness may carry a cost. In Wittmann et al. (2006), later types carried more sleep debt on work days. If early starts are part of your week, the sleep score may partly reflect timing rather than habits. Sleep hours before days tagged “Early start” should show which.

A question to sit with: Your clock still leans late, as it did in March, and your Brain Age result shows sleep as your weakest area. If the world keeps waking you before your body is ready, then which matters more: the early starts, or the sleep they cost?

Evidence and limits

The study behind this paragraph

In volunteers from teenagers to retirees, later chronotypes tended to show a bigger gap between work-day and free-day sleep timing, called social jetlag, and more sleep debt on work days.

How it relates: Related idea

What does not carry over: Our test does not measure social jetlag; the paper’s findings on smoking and other stimulants are never shown.

Your values

Chronotype 26 Evening-Leaning · scale 0–100Earlier, Mar 12: 24, Evening-Leaning

3Brain Age IndexSaved Sep 15, 2026

Mostly favourable inputs, with sleep the weak spot

Overall 71, toward the higher end. Lifestyle 80 is your strongest input area; Sleep 52 your weakest.

This sleep score combines duration, quality and breathing-related disruption, so it has more than one possible source. Your later clock is one: timing that fights your mornings can shorten sleep without changing habits. Quality and breathing are others, which a clinician can check. If sleep stays short even before days without an “Early start”, timing is not the main source.

A question to sit with: Sleep is the weakest part of your brain age picture, and your Chronotype result says your clock leans late. If your nights are short because your mornings run on someone else’s clock, then whose clock is it, and could it move?

Evidence and limits

Always shown with this test

An MRI brain-age estimate comes from a model trained on brain scans. Our Brain Age Index is a questionnaire model, not an MRI estimate.

Cole, J. H., & Franke, K. (2017). Predicting age using neuroimaging: Innovative brain ageing biomarkers. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(12), 681–690. doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.10.001

Your values

Overall 71 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Cardiometabolic 76 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Lifestyle & Movement 80 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Sleep & Recovery 52 near the middle · scale 0–100
Cognitive Reserve 74 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Mind & Mood 68 toward the higher end · scale 0–100
Sensory & Protective 70 toward the higher end · scale 0–100

4Adult Autism Self-InventorySaved Jul 20, 2026

The shape may matter more than the total

Total 38, “Some patterns resonated”. Sensory 14 is your strongest dimension; Social 6 your lightest.

Your answers fit sensory statements most and social-reading ones least, so a single total hides the shape. None of your other results has a planned link to this inventory, so it is read on its own. Since spring, have the places you spend time become quieter or louder? Days tagged “Calm setting” would show whether surroundings move your energy.

A question to sit with: Your answers fit sensory statements most and social ones least, so one total hides your shape. If your surroundings shape your energy more than people do, then how much of what you call your mood is really the room you are in?

Evidence and limits

Always shown with this test

In adults referred for an autism assessment, self-reported trait scores did not predict who went on to receive a diagnosis, so a trait score cannot settle a diagnosis.

Ashwood, K. L., Gillan, N., Horder, J., et al. (2016). Predicting the diagnosis of autism in adults using the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 46(12), 2595–2604. doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001082

Your values

Social 6 toward the lower end · scale 0–20
Sensory 14 toward the higher end · scale 0–20
Routine 11 near the middle · scale 0–20
Focus 7 near the middle · scale 0–20
Total 38 Some patterns resonated · scale 0–80

A one-week experiment

If you have no fixed start on Tuesday or Thursday, then wake without an alarm and note the time in your check-in.

Likely obstacle: The habit of setting the alarm anyway.

Tags to note in your daily check-in:

Early start
Heavy day
Calm setting

One more question: How likely are you to wake without an alarm on Tuesday or Thursday, if nothing fixes your start: not likely, maybe, likely or certain?

Studies used and one limitation

One limitation: Your Brain Age and inventory results have nothing earlier to compare with, so this reading cannot say whether they changed since spring.

The study this reading cites

Wittmann, M., Dinich, J., Merrow, M., & Roenneberg, T. (2006). Social jetlag: Misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiology International, 23(1–2), 497–509. doi.org/10.1080/07420520500545979

Start 7-day free trial

Before you close this tab

Without an account, your result is not stored with us.

On any of our 33 tests, a free account keeps it with its date and scales, so a retake later shows what changed. You can retake a test any time. You can't go back and take today's.

What you get with no account, with a free account and with Plus
Keep your record
	No account	Free$0, no card	Plus$6.99 a month, 7-day free trial
Your resultFrom any of our 33 tests.	Not stored	Kept, with date and scales; some tests show part of it until you buy its report	Every part of every result
Retake laterEvery scale, then and now.	Nothing to compare	Side by side	Included
Check-insMood, energy, stress and sleep.	None	Daily, with charts	Included
Weekly reviewYour last seven days, privately.	None	Included	Included
Logic LetterOur weekly email.	Shared edition	Personal edition, if you opt in	Included
Export and deletionYour record stays yours.	Nothing kept	Any time	Any time, and after you cancel
Understand it
Read results togetherYour own question, answered from your saved results.	Worked examples	One reviewed connection, and one free reading of 2 results	Your question across 2 to 4 results, 3 a day
Follow-up questionsAnswer a reading's question and it writes back.	None	Plus only	Included
Saved insightsKeep the readings that matter and reopen them.	None	The one 2-result reading above	Any reading you choose
Act on it
One-week experimentsA small change, tagged in your check-ins for seven days.	None	The day-7 card, after a reading	The day-7 card, then “Read my week” and the next experiment in one tap
Plans and practicesTurn a reading into steps, record attempts, review what helped.	None	Plus only	Included
DecisionsWeigh a decision against a saved reading.	None	Plus only	Included
		Create account	Start 7-day free trial

One-week experiments come from deep readings, the format of the worked examples above. Every Plus reading links its interpretations to your scores: a perspective, never a diagnosis.

Free with an account · worked example

See exactly what changed.

A retake, on its own scaleFlourishing Index, 0 to 10

June 12: 5.9. September 12: 6.4. The change is shown, not judged.

Thirty days of check-insEnergy, 1 (Drained) to 5 (Energized)

23 check-ins in 30 days, Energy 2 to 5. Missed days stay blank.

Your pace, your choice

Start with a free connection.

Free LifeGraph+

Keep your original results and explanations, compare supported retakes, follow daily check-ins, see a private weekly review of what you recorded, and explore a current connection with its evidence and next-step preview. Every account also gets one free reading of two saved results. History, export and deletion remain available after cancellation.

Start free

LifeGraph+

$6.99 / month
or $69.90 / year, billed once (2 months free)

7-day free trial on your first LifeGraph+ subscription. Your card is saved at checkout and nothing is charged until the trial ends. Cancel before then and you pay nothing.

Ask your own questions across your saved results: up to three completed cross-readings per 24 hours, with follow-ups, each linking its interpretations to the source values. Keep the insights you choose, turn one into a guide or a manageable practice, and review what helped. Everything free stays free, and your history, export and deletion remain yours.

Review current plans and the final total in your account before subscribing.

See LifeGraph+ in your account →

Keep what is yours.

Your original free records remain accessible after cancellation. Export and deletion are available to every member.

Assessment PDFs are separate purchases. The Logic Letter stays free.

The practical details

Frequently asked questions.

About saving, readings, plans, sign-in and privacy.

What is LifeGraph+?

LifeGraph+ is LifeByLogic's private space for your test results. A free account keeps results from all 33 of our tests with their date and scales, compares retakes side by side, and adds daily check-ins and a private weekly review. Plus reads two to four of your saved results from our 11 core assessments together, answers your own question with the evidence shown, and helps you turn what you learn into a plan.

Is LifeGraph+ free?

Yes. Saving results from all 33 of our tests, retake comparisons, daily check-ins with charts, the weekly review and the personal Logic Letter are free, with no card. Every account also gets one free reading of two saved results. Where a test's page shows only its score and archetype until you buy its report, a free account shows the same of that result until then. Plus costs $6.99 a month, with a 7-day free trial on your first subscription.

What does Plus add?

Every part of every saved result. Your own question across two to four saved results, up to three completed readings a day, each linking its interpretations to your scores. Follow-up questions, saved insights you can reopen, plans and practices that record what you tried and what helped, and decisions weighed against a saved reading. With a deep reading, a one-week experiment in your check-ins ends with a Plus reading of your week and the next experiment in one tap. Everything free stays free.

What does a reading look like?

Like the six worked examples above. A deep reading opens with a chord of your chosen results and a short answer to your question. It shows each result on its own scale, where your results agree and pull apart, one card per result with the study behind it and a question to sit with, and a one-week experiment you can start in your check-ins.

Is a reading a diagnosis?

No. Results and readings are for reflection. A reading offers possibilities linked to your scores and never claims that one result causes another. Readings that include Stress & Burnout, Meaning in Life or Flourishing show support lines, and a result held for care stays out of readings.

Which results can I save?

Results from all 33 LifeByLogic tests, with their date, version and scales. Finish a test, then create a free account in the same tab within two hours and confirm the save.

Readings, the map and the personal Logic Letter use only our 11 core assessments.

Which results can a Plus reading use?

Two to four complete, supported saved results, or one alongside selected daily check-ins or a reviewed plan and a takeaway you approve. Readings are for adults' own results; family and child results are not part of them.

The free reviewed connection uses only current, complete Career Choice Signature v1.0 and Flourishing v2.1 or v2.2 results, after you confirm they describe you now.

How many readings does Plus include?

Choose two to four saved assessment results and a question, or start with one result alongside selected daily check-ins or a reviewed plan and a takeaway you approve. Each reading links interpretations to source values, offers another perspective and suggests a practical next step. Up to three completed readings and six generation attempts per 24 hours. Failed readings do not use the completed-reading allowance. Reopening the latest unchanged cached reading or a saved insight uses no allowance.

Your original scores stay unchanged. Interpretations are perspectives to explore, not measured correlations. The sample workspace and worked examples use invented results and make no analysis request.

How do I create an account or sign in?

Three ways, whether you are new or returning: continue with Google, use your email and a password, or ask for a magic link. A magic link is a one-time sign-in link we email you. It works for 15 minutes, needs no password, and creates your account if you are new.

How does the 7-day free trial work?

The trial comes with your first LifeGraph+ subscription. Your card is saved at checkout and nothing is charged until the trial ends. Cancel before then in Manage billing and you pay nothing.

What happens to my data if I cancel?

Your saved results, check-ins and history stay readable after you cancel, and export and deletion are available to every member at any time. Scores and answers never go to advertisers.

Can the Logic Letter be about my results?

Yes, if you choose. Every reader gets the weekly shared edition. With a free account you can switch on the personal edition in settings: your saved results from the 11 core assessments by name and date, and for seven of the 11, when a retake is due. It never carries a score.

Who is behind LifeGraph+?

LifeByLogic, founded by Abiot Y. Derbie, PhD, a cognitive neuroscientist. Our assessments are built from published research, and every card of a deep reading names the study behind its paragraph.

Why trust this

What we will never do.

Founded by Abiot Y. Derbie, PhD, cognitive neuroscientist.

Last reviewed October 28, 2026

Diagnose you. Results and readings are for reflection.
Claim one result causes another. A reading offers possibilities, linked to your scores.
Sell your data. Scores and answers never go to advertisers.
Hold your record back. It stays readable after you cancel; export or delete it any time.

Create account Start 7-day free trial

Discover your next “aha!” moment.what your results reveal together.the bigger picture of you.the story your results tell.

Two to four results, read together.

“Why am I tired even though I like what I do?”

Each result on its own scale

1Meaning in Life

2Stress & Burnout

3Chronotype

4Flourishing Index

How your results fit together

Where they agree

Where they pull apart

Competing explanations

What would show this wrong

Direction is clear; proof that it lands is not

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

Depleted more than pressured, and the fix differs

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

A later clock meeting early days

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

Giving a lot, with little say over your time

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

A one-week experiment

Studies used and one limitation

“Why do my plans fall apart by Wednesday?”

Each result on its own scale

1TypeAtlas

2Chronotype

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

Competing explanations

What would show this wrong

Structure is your strength; its start time may not be

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

Your clock may run later than your plans

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

A one-week experiment

Studies used and one limitation

“Why do I feel alone even with good people around me?”

Each result on its own scale

1Attachment Style

2Flourishing Index

3TypeAtlas

How your results fit together

Where they agree

Where they pull apart

Competing explanations

What would show this wrong

Support may be there, but leaning on it is hard

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

Close support is low, and so is time to yourself

Your values

Preferring quiet is not the same as keeping distance

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

A one-week experiment

Studies used and one limitation

“What kind of work would feel like mine again?”

Each result on its own scale

1Career Choice Signature

2Flourishing Index

How your results fit together

Where they pull apart

Competing explanations

What would show this wrong

Your strongest pull is toward ideas, not finishing

The study behind this paragraph

Your values

Growth is high; time and work fit are low

Your values

A one-week experiment

Studies used and one limitation

“Why do small setbacks wipe out my whole evening?”

Each result on its own scale

Discover your next “aha!” moment.