Family Lab · A LifeByLogic Tool
Family Screen Balance Index: How Balanced Is Your Family's Screen Time?
The Family Screen Balance Index™ helps you see your family's screen rhythm for one child — across co-use, boundaries, content, displacement, soothing, and modeling — using questions reworded from public AAP and WHO media guidance. You pick your child's age, answer a few questions about a typical week, and get a balance map showing what's strong and what's worth a small change. It is strengths-first and private — never a grade, never a verdict, and never about screen addiction.
Ages Covered
Birth to 17
Grounded In
AAP & WHO
Time to Complete
~5 minutes
Your Answers
Never leave your browser
CC BY-NC 4.0
LBL-FSBI v1.0
Educational · Strengths-first, not a verdict · AAP/WHO-grounded
The Family Screen Balance Index is an LBL-original educational tool. It helps you see your family's screen ecosystem — co-use, boundaries, content, displacement, soothing, and modeling — using questions reworded from public guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the World Health Organization. It is not a clinical or screening tool; it does not diagnose or measure screen addiction or any condition; and it never grades your child or your parenting. Read the full methodology for the dimensions, scoring, and limitations.
If screens feel like they're crowding out sleep, meals, school, or time together, and it is weighing on you, that is worth a calm conversation with your pediatrician, who knows your child and can help you think it through. Small, steady changes tend to work better than big sudden ones. For practical, pediatrician-backed ideas, the AAP's family media resources at HealthyChildren.org are a good place to start.
§ Methodology · LBL-FSBI v1.0
The method behind the Family Screen Balance Index.
The Family Screen Balance Index is an LBL-original, age-aware parent-report that maps a family’s screen ecosystem for one child. Its questions are reworded into plain language from public guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics (Council on Communications and Media, 2016) and the World Health Organization (2019). It rests on a simple, evidence-informed idea: with screens, what matters most is not a single hour count but balance — whether screens are shared, bounded, good quality, and kept from crowding out sleep, play, and time together.
This page documents everything: the six dimensions it measures, the 24 items and where their wording comes from, the four age bands and how they tune the read, how each dimension is scored without a grade, how the strengths-first archetype is determined, and the known limits. The tool is observational and educational; it is not a validated screen, and it does not diagnose or measure screen addiction.
A balance map is not a grade, and a strained area is not a verdict. The goal is to help you see your family’s screen rhythm, lead with what you are already doing well, and make one or two small changes that fit your real life.
LBL-FSBI framing — an LBL-original instrument built on public AAP and WHO media guidance. It reproduces no proprietary questionnaire.
The six dimensions and where the items come from.
Your answers are read across six dimensions, four items each, for 24 scored items plus one context question about typical daily volume. Each item is reworded into plain, parent-facing language from public AAP and WHO guidance. You answer on a five-point frequency scale (Never to Almost always); nine items are reverse-keyed so a low frequency is the balanced answer. High always means more balanced.
Six dimensions24 LBL-original items + 1 context item · reworded from AAP/WHO · high = more balanced
Co-Use & Connection4 items
Shared, talked-about screen use vs. solo and out of sight.Boundaries & Routine4 items
Predictable limits, screen-free times and zones, and how endings go.Content Quality4 items
Chosen, active, age-appropriate content vs. passive endless feeds.Displacement Protection4 items
Whether screens crowd out sleep, movement, in-person time, schoolwork.Soothing Balance4 items
Whether screens are one of several ways to settle, not the only one.Modeling & Climate4 items
Whether adults' habits and the family's tone support balance.
How each area is scored, and the archetype.
Each dimension is the average of its four items, reverse items flipped, rescaled to 0–100, and shown as a band rather than a number: Strong (70 and up), Steady (45–69), or Strained (below 45). There is deliberately no overall score and no comparison to other families. Your six dimension scores are matched to the nearest of five named screen-rhythm archetypes (by straight-line distance across the six areas), each written strengths-first:
- Connected & Intentional — strong across the board; screens shared, chosen, and bounded.
- Busy & Improvising — warm and connected, but limits flex with a hectic life.
- Boundary-Light — screens fill the gaps; low-conflict, with limits still forming.
- Solo-Leaning — lots of independent screen time; an opening for more shared moments.
- Soothe-Reliant — screens have become the main off-switch; room to widen the toolkit.
How age tunes the read.
The same 24 items are scored the same way at every age; what changes is interpretation. A given amount of solo, passive viewing reads very differently at 18 months than at 15 years. For babies and toddlers especially, near-zero screen time is the healthy anchor, so when a family is keeping screens minimal at a young age, the tool celebrates that rather than penalizing a low co-use or content reading.
Under 2Almost no screen time apart from video chats; any use best shared. Minimal screens here is read as a strength, not low engagement.
2 to 5Up to about an hour a day of high-quality, co-used content with consistent limits.
6 to 12Less about a strict hourly cap, more about steady limits, good content, and protecting sleep, activity, and in-person time.
13 to 17Collaborative limits, content quality, protecting sleep and wellbeing, and respecting growing independence.
What this tool doesn’t capture.
Intellectual honesty requires naming the limits of any short parent-report.
§ Known limitations of this tool
- It is not a screening or diagnostic test. It does not diagnose or measure screen addiction or any condition, and it cannot replace a conversation with your pediatrician.
- It is one caregiver’s view at one moment. Another adult in the home might answer differently, and that difference is itself worth talking about.
- It covers one child. Siblings and the whole-household picture can differ; run it separately if that helps.
- Balance is not the only thing that matters. Content, context, and your child’s temperament all play a role that no six-item-per-area tool fully captures.
- Guidance evolves. Pediatric media advice is updated over time; treat the age anchors as a sensible starting point, not a hard rule.